Topics: Economics, Economic development, Economy Pages: 22 (7417 words) Published: December 16, 2012
Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa (Volume 13, No.4, 2011) ISSN: 1520-5509 Clarion University of Pennsylvania, Clarion, Pennsylvania


I.O. Manyanhaire1, R.Rwafa1 and J. Mutangadura2 1. Geography and Environmental Studies, Zimbabwe Open University. 2. English and Communication, University of Zimbabwe ABSTRACT Growth points (GPs), growth poles (GPs), small towns (STs) or growth centres (GCs) as they are variously named in literature are defined as centres with strong resource base that can initiate a cumulative causation process that culminate in continuous and sustainable development. This paper reviews the definition of the concept and provides a critique of the constraints to the development of growth centres. It is the premise of this theoretical paper that it is possible to reengineer the strategy with a view to achieve sustainable development at these growth poles. Despite its widespread application most of the growth poles have never been successful because of natural-soico-economic complex of factors that have not been adequately conceptualized by the responsible governments.

INTRODUCTION AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK The analytical framework for this papers centres on four major aspects. Firstly, the introduction and the meaning of the growth centre as perceived from a simple linguistic perspective and as derived by regional planners and theorists of the quantitative approaches. The paper also to gives a more simplified and operational definition relevant to Zimbabwe. In the second and third sections the paper addresses the limitations of the growth centre strategy and the strategies adopted to propel growth respectively. The last component focuses on the possibility for reengineering the concept in the Zimbabwean context. The concept of reengineering in this paper implies modification of planning and implementation of the model based on synthesis of the positives of the traditional theoretical thinking on the development of growth points. It is the premise of this paper that established planning protocols are correct but have to be modified in an incrementalist fashion to capture the current dimensions in social planning. Thus, the use of the term reengineering assumes the existence of an array of practical and theoretical planning philosophy from which improvements can be made in the context of sustainable development.

The term growth point (GP) means increasing in size both in number of facilities, building and services provided at an identified centre. Thus, once a centre has been established there should be an observable change in spatial structure and pattern. One would assume that the spatio-temporal expansion is development. It quickly reminds one of the links between growth and development. Whilst the word growth implies expansion development implies quantitative growth and the quality of growth introduced to the selected centres. Thus, these terms are commonly used interchangeably in rural planning.


A theoretical tracking of the concept of growth centres links it to a Frenchman, François Perroux who proposed the Growth Centre Theory in 1958. His ideas were a synthesis of the fusion of the various central place and core periphery theories that took centre stage about the same time. The core is the centre of development. It is characterized by an increase in economic activities and development of the spatial structure, a process known as morphogenesis. The initial triggers include; water supply raw materials, energy and a threshold population size capable of consuming services and goods. Some of the centres developed due to a ‘Historical accident’ which triggered the cumulative causation process. Cumulative in this sense means accumulation of wealth in a geographic space with a multiplier effect. The multiplier effect in this sense implies the expansion of economic activities...

References: Bradford, M.G. and Kent, W.A. (1987) Theories and their Applications. Oxford University Press, London. Cleaver, K., 2003, Article on rural development strategies, Geneva. Conroy, M.E. (1973). Rejection of the growth centre strategy in Latin America regional development planning. Land Economics, Vol._ 49, No_ 4 (Nov_, 1973), pp_ 371-380.htm. Conyers, D. (1990) Decentralisation and Development Planning.A Comparative (Eds) chapter 2. Conyers, D. (2001) Regional development. ZOU Module, Harare. De Valk P. and Wekwete K.H. (1990) (eds) Decentralization for Participatory Planning. Gower Publishing House. Dewar, D. (1986) Industrial Decentralization Policy in South Africa: Rhetoric and Practice. In “Urban Studies Volume 28, 1986 pp 363-375.” Dewar, D., Todes, A & Watson, V, (1984). Industrial decentralization policy as a mechanism for regional development in South Africa: its premises and record. Occasional papers No. 17, Perspective. In de Valk and Wekwete
Urban Problems Research Unit, University of Cape Town. Douglass, M. (1998) a regional network strategy for reciprocal rural- urban linkages: an agenda for policy research with reference to Indonesia. TWPR, Vol.20. No 1.1998 pg 1-31. Dixon, C., (1990). Rural development in the third world, Rutledge publishing house, London. Escobar, A., (1995). Encountering Development, the making and unmaking of the third world, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA. Fair, T.J.D. (1983) Africa Institute of Southern Africa, Pretoria. Zambia; the Search for Rural-Urban Balance: A Review. Government of Zimbabwe (1981) Growth with equity: An Economic Policy Statement. Government Printers, Harare. Helmsing, A.H. (1986) Rural Industries and Growth Points. Issues in an Ongoing Policy debate in Zimbabwe, Occasional paper no.2. Department of Rural and urban Planning, UZ, Harare. . Manyanhaire, I.O. Mhishi, B Svotwa, E. and Sithole, N. (2009) Growth Points or Declining Points? A Case of Magunje Growth Point in Mashonaland West Province of Zimbabwe. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa (Volume 10, No.4, 2009.pages 506-519 Mlia, J.R.N. and Kaluwa, B.M. (1990) Equity and Economic Growth: The Locational Dilemma of Malawi’s Rural Growth Centres Project. In “Eastern and Southern Africa Geographical Journal, Volume 1.No.1, 1990. P55-64” Mutizwa-Mangiza, N.D. and Helmsing, A.H.J. (1991) (Eds). Rural Development and Planning in Zimbabwe. Athenaeum Press Ltd. Musampa, C.M. (2006) The demise of a South African growth point, Butterworth in the Eastern Cape: a community development model as an alternative strategy for development. Development Southern Africa Vol. 23, No. 1, March 2006 pgs 86-96. Perroux, F. (1958) “La notion de pole de croissance” (The Concept of Growth pole) Economuque, Appliqué, nos. 1 and 2. Wekwete, K.H. (1988) Rural Growth Points in Zimbabwe —prospects for the future* Journal of Social Development in Africa (1988) 3, 2, 5-16. Wekwete, K.H. (2001) The impact of National Policy on Urban Settlements in Zimbabwe in De Wet, C and Fox, R. Transforming settlement in Southern Africa, international African Seminars.
Wekwete.K.H. (1997) Regions, regional policy Planning and development in Africa- a perspective of east and southern Africa In Helmsing, A.H.J. and Guimarae, J. (Eds). Locality, State and development. The Hague Institute of Social Studies. Zimbabwe Institute of Public Administration and Management (1992).Rural development in Zimbabwe, A conference report, Prestige business services, Zimbabwe.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free