International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism Vol. 13, No. 2, March 2010, 201Á223
Cross-modal bilingualism: language contact as evidence of linguistic transfer in sign bilingual education
PhD student and Member of the research projects Hum2006-10235-Fil (UPF) and FFI200801452-E (UIMP), both directed by Lourdes Diaz and funded by the Spanish Ministry of Research MICINN, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
(Received 9 November 2009; ﬁnal version received 9 November 2009) New positive attitudes towards language interaction in the realm of bilingualism open new horizons for sign bilingual education. Plaza-Pust and Morales-Lopez have ´
innovatively reconceptualised a new cross-disciplinary approach to sign bilingualism, based on both sociolinguistics and psycholinguistics. According to this framework, cross-modal bilingualism within the deaf community is a natural, dynamic phenomenon, where code mixing and code switching between languages of different modalities Á signed or spoken/written Á are often a pragmatic choice of the signer/speaker that serves specific purposes in specific contexts. Following this line of thought, cross-modal contact situations may be viewed as a sign of sophistication, as in any bilingualism, and a fundamental, transitory phase of bilingual language acquisition. Transfer from a sign language to a written second language has been put into question in the sign bilingual education literature. This project intends to address that question through the investigation of cross-modal contact categories found in the written productions of 15 deaf students in a bilingual secondary school in Barcelona. We argue that the pooling of resources that makes deaf students use structures from Catalan Sign Language in written English is suggestive of linguistic transfer at a morphosyntactic level and that language contact is positive to students’ bilingual development in this specific context. The impact of this finding for language teaching policy, practice and research in deaf education will be discussed. This study is part of a larger study to further analyse these contact phenomena according to milestones in second language acquisition of written English, Catalan and Spanish, and seeks to establish parallels between the bilingual acquisition development of these deaf students and that of their hearing counterparts. Keywords: cross-modal bilingualism; language interaction; language contact; code mixing; code switching; linguistic transfer
Attention from researchers in bilingualism and bilingual education needs to be directed to the way language interaction has dominated the debate around sign bilingual education over the last decade. By language interaction we understand, in this article, the continuum of language contact that may take place under a plurilingual conception of language knowledge organisation versus previous multilingual conceptions, as advised in the Common European Framework proposed by *Email: email@example.com
ISSN 1367-0050 print/ISSN 1747-7522 online
# 2010 Taylor & Francis
the Council of Europe (2001). If multilingualism has traditionally been understood as the simple addition of different languages, just as if they were saved in different mental compartments, plurilingualism is here conceived in relation to a continuous interaction of the different languages involved in plurilingual knowledge all through a life span. Language contact is the evidence of language interaction that can be found when analysing the oral, written or signed discourse of plurilinguals. It can either take the form of code mixing Á if it includes elements of both languages, or code switching Á if the code is commuted at a certain point. Cross-modal bilingualism1 would be an accurate linguistic term to refer to bilingualism involving two languages of different...
References: Barbera, G. 2007. La cohesio discursiva i l’espai en la llengua de signes catalana. Tesis doctoral
Bhatia, T., and W.C. Ritchie, eds. 2004. The handbook of bilingualism, 406Á36. Oxford:
Bishop, D.V.M. 1982. Comprehension of spoken, written and signed sentences in childhood
Butler, Y., and K. Hakuta. 2004. Bilingualism and second language acquisition. In The
handbook of bilingualism, ed
Chamberlain, C., and R. Mayberry. 2000. Theorizing about the relation between American
Sign Language and reading
Clark, D., J. Begue, G. Gilbert, and B. Weber. 2008. The guessing game: The effect of morphographemic organization on word attack skills. Paper presented at the 2nd International
Forum of the Deaf, October 7, in Fez, Morocco
vl2.gallaudet.edu/assets/section7/document40.pdf (accessed October 15, 2008).
Colin, S., A. Magnan, J. Ecalle, and J. Leybaert. 2007. Relation between deaf children’s
phonological skills in kindergarten and word recognition performance in ﬁrst grade.
Council of Europe. 2001. Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning,
Cummins, J. 1989. A theoretical framework of bilingual special education. Exceptional
Children 56, no
Dubuisson, C., A. Parisot, and A. Vercaigne-Menard. 2008. Bilingualism and deafness:
El Libro Blanco de la Lengua de Signos Espanola en el Sistema Educativo. 2003. Ofﬁcial
Frigola, S., and J. Quer. 2005. Discurso (in)directo y de´cticos en estructuras de cambio de rol
Gawlitzek-Maiwald, I., and R. Tracy. 1996. Bilingual bootstrapping. Linguistics 34, no. 5: 901Á
Genesee, F. 2002. Portrait of the bilingual child. In Portraits of the L2 user, ed. V. Cook, 167Á
Gras, V. 2004. El sistema verbal en la lengua de signos catalana (LSC) [The verbal system in
Catalan Sign Language]
Compostela, 3Á7 de mayo de 2004), 4 vols, pages 3848
Gunther, K-B., I. Schafke, K. Koppitz, and M. Matthaei. 2004. Vergleichende Untersuchungen
Hanson, V.L., E. Goodell, and C.A. Perfetti. 1991. Tongue-twister effects in the silent reading
of hearing and deaf college students
Spanish sign language]. http://www.cervantesvirtual.com/seccion/signos/ (accessed August
Herrero Blanco, A., and A. Peidro. 2007. Los tipos de plural en la Lengua de signos espanola
general, 1051Á64. Madrid: Arco Libros.
Hoffmeister, R. 2000. A piece of the puzzle: ASL and reading comprehension in deaf children.
Izzo, A. 2002. Phonemic awareness and reading ability: An investigation with young readers
who are deaf
Jarque, M.J., M. Massone, M.P. Fernandez Viader, M. Bosch, and J. Segimon. 2007. Orden
Las Lenguas y su estructura, 1065Á74. Madrid: Arco/Libros.
Johnson, R., S. Liddel, and C. Erting. 1989. Unlocking the curriculum: Principles for achieving
access in deaf education
Kelly, L., and D. Barac-Cikoja. 2008. Elements of skill crucial for deaf readers. Paper presented
at the Conference at the Gallaudet Research Institute, February 13, in Washington, DC.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document