Topics: Linguistics, Meaning of life, Sociology Pages: 5 (2120 words) Published: May 15, 2013
The language have different features that are present in every social situation, three of these features are: intertextuality, context and culture. Intertextuality is the faculty that we use in our language when we speak; we use words that already hear in different contexts and a specific culture, so this faculty we use it in social behavior. All these features combined we can do actions through the language and the words, this are the potential meaning and can change in different contexts. All these features are inserted in a social behavior and seem from a social point of view. It is the power of the language and how we can do through the words different actions.Keywords: Intertextualiy, context, culture, social.
The power of the language is present in our daily living; language is used for different purposes and for different reasons, it is impressing how much we can do through language and how our behavior can be reflected from how we speak and how we communicate to the others. This language has many features, one of these features is the context and how we can use the words that we hear the different ways, this feature is called intertextuality. This article will concentrate on one hand intertextuality and on the other hand language in a social perspective and how intertextuality is present in this social perspective. Intertextuality inserted in the social environment

Every thought than crosses our mind, every word that we use for describing it is a word that we heard or read before, with these words we make phrases, sentences, paragraphs, texts, books, etc. “We create texts out of the sea of former texts that surround us, the sea of language we live in”.(Bazerman, 2004, p. 2). This mental process that we use when we talk is call intertextuality. We use intertextuality every time; when we write about a topic, also when we have a conversation we have to use intertextuality, even when we think, we use it in an unconsciously way. We relate each word with another, one text with another text, for doing more understandable the things that we do not know. We can say that we use intertextuality like a tool for understanding any word, text, topic, sentence, meaning, etc. On the other hand, we always acquire new knowledge, but we cannot understand all of it, for this reason we have to connect what we do not know with the meanings that we already know. It is because of that, we always need examples for understanding what we do not know; it is a possibility that in these examples we find something that can relate with what we do know. It is a fact that we communicate through intertextuality and all the words are relate with others words. This is a feature of our language, even when we speak or write we use it, this feature is present in our daily living so is almost impossible said that intertextuality is something unknown for us or for our language. We use intertextuality from the different perspectives and create different meanings for the words that we already hear in the others contexts. We live in an environment that we have to communicate our ideas, feelings, thoughts, etc. We communicate through the words that we hear, in fact we use intertextuality for do that, we use this faculty as a social faculty because we use it for communicate with others, one of the most important feature of our language is that we use it for communicate. This communication is important in different ways, but from a social point of view is the most important thing because without this communication we cannot socialize with others. Also we use this faculty with a semantic level because it can give us a certain tool for understanding all the things that we want to, because everything is related with another thing, all the words have a relation with each other, maybe is not completely same in a semantic level...

References: Bazerman, C. (2004). Intertextuality: How Texts Rely on Other Texts. En C. Bazerman, Intertextuality: How Texts Rely on Other Texts (p. 2).
Halliday, M. (1973). Language in a social perspective. En M. Halliday, Explorations in the Functions of Language (pp.31-32).
J.L.Lemke. (2004). Intertextuality and educational research. In J.L.Lemke, Uses of Intertextuality in Classroom and Educational Research. (p. 3).
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Monograph Essay
  • Communication Monographs Essay
  • aspirin monograph Essay
  • King Hussein Monograph Essay
  • Drug Monograph of Solifenacin Research Paper
  • Florencio Monographs Essay
  • Monograph 26 Essay
  • Essay about HR Monograph

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free