Topics: Linguistics, Politics, Political science Pages: 24 (8510 words) Published: April 26, 2013
20. Political Discourse


Subject Linguistics » Discourse Analysis

Key-Topics political

DOI: 10.1111/b.9780631205968.2003.00021.x

0 Introduction

The study of political discourse, like that of other areas of discourse analysis, covers a broad range of subject matter, and draws on a wide range of analytic methods. Perhaps more than with other areas of discourse, however, one needs at the outset to consider the reflexive and potentially ambiguous nature of the term political discourse. The term is suggestive of at least two possibilities: first, a discourse which is itself political; and second, an analysis of political discourse as simply an example discourse type, without explicit reference to political content or political context. But things may be even more confusing. Given that on some definitions almost all discourse may be considered political (Shapiro 1981), then all analyses of discourse are potentially political, and, therefore, on one level, all discourse analysis is political discourse. This potentially confusing situation arises, in the main, from definitions of the political in terms of general issues such as power, conflict, control, or domination (see Fairclough 1992a, 1995; Giddens 1991; Bourdieu 1991; van Dijk 1993; Chilton and Schaffer 1997), since any of these concepts may be employed in almost any form of discourse. Recently, for example, in a study of a psychotherapeutic training institution, Diamond (1995) refers to her study of the discourse of staff meetings as “political,” simply because issues of power and control are being worked out. They are being worked out at different levels, however: at interpersonal, personal, institutional, and educational levels for example, and in different strategic ways (Chilton 1997). By treating all discourse as political, in its most general sense, we may be in danger of significantly overgeneralizing the concept of political discourse. Perhaps we might avoid these difficulties if we simply delimited our subject matter as being concerned with formal/informal political contexts and political actors (Graber 1981); with, that is, inter alia, politicians, political institutions, governments, political media, and political supporters operating in political environments to achieve political goals. This first approximation makes clearer the kinds of limits we might place on thinking about political discourse, but it may also allow for development. For example, analysts who themselves wish to present a political case become, in one sense, political actors, and their own discourse becomes, therefore, political. In this sense much of what is referred to as critical linguistics (Fairclough 1992b) or critical discourse analysis (van Dijk 1993; Wodak 1995) relates directly to work on political discourse, not only because the material for analysis is often formally political but also, perhaps, because the analysts have explicitly made themselves political actors (see van Dijk, this volume). But such a delimitation, like all delimitations, is not without its problems. For example, how do we deal with the work of Liebes and Ribak (1991) on family discussions of political events? Is this political discourse, or family discourse of the political? In one sense it is both – but the issue of which may simply be a matter of emphasis (see, for example, Ochs and Taylor 1992). While delimitations of the political are difficult to maintain in exact terms, they are nevertheless useful starting points. Equally, while one can accept that it is difficult to imagine a fully objective and nonpolitical account of political discourse, analysts can, at best, and indeed should, make clear their own motivations and perspectives. This may range from setting some form of “democratic” ideal for discourse against which other forms of political discourse are then assessed (Gastil 1993) to explicitly stating one's political goals in targeting political discourse for...

References: Aristotle. (1991) On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civil Discourse, trans G. Kennedy . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
Bakhtin, M. (1981) The Dialogical Imagination , ed. M. Holquist, trans. C. Emerson and M. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press .
Bolinger, D. (1982) Language: The Loaded Weapon London: Longman .
Bourdieu, P. (1991) Language and Symbolic Power Cambridge: Polity .
Cameron, D. (1995) Verbal Hygiene London: Routledge and Kegan Paul .
Carbonell, J. G. (1978) POLITICS: automated ideological reasoning . Cognitive Science (2) , 27 51.
Chafe, W. and Nichols, J. (1986) Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology Norwood, NJ: Ablex .
Chilton, P. (1985) Words, discourse and metaphors: the meanings of deter, deterrent and deterrence . In P. Chilton (ed.), Language and the Nuclear Arms Debate . London: Pinter , 103 27.
Chilton, P. (1987) Discourse and politics . In T. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction . London: Sage , 206 30.
Chilton, P. (1990) Politeness and politics . Discourse and Society (1) (2), 201 24.
Chilton, P. and Ilyin, M. (1993) Metaphor in political discourse. The case of the common European house . Discourse and Society (4) (7), 7 31.
Chilton, P. and Schaffer, C. (1997) Discourse and politics . In T. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction. Vol. 2 . London: Sage , 206 31.
Cicero. (1971) Selected Works , trans. M. Grant. Harmondsworth: Penguin .
Diamond, P. (1995) Status and Power in Verbal Interaction: A Study of Discourse in a Close-knit Social Network Amsterdam: Benjamins .
Dunmire, P. L. (1995) Realising the hypothetical: a critical linguistic analysis of a projected event . Paper presented to the conference on Political Linguistics, University of Antwerp .
Edleman, M. (1971) Politics as Symbolic Action New York: Academic Press .
Edleman, M. (1977) Political Language New York: Academic Press .
Edleman, M. (1988) Constructing the Political Spectacle Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
Edwards, D. and Potter, J. (1992a) Discursive Psychology London: Sage .
Fairclough, N. (1989) Language and Power London: Longman .
Fairclough, N. (1992a) Discourse and Social Change Oxford: Blackwell .
Fairclough, N. (1992b) Critical Language Awareness London: Longman .
Fairclough, N. (1995) Critical Linguistics London: Longman .
Fairclough, N. and Wodak, R. (1997) Critical discourse analysis . In T. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction. Vol. 2 . London: Sage , 258 85.
Foucault, M. (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge London: Tavistock Publications .
Fowler, R. and Marshall, J. (1985) Power . In T. van Dijk (ed.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis . London: Academic Press , 47 63.
Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G., and Trew, T. (eds) (1979) Language and Control London: Routledge and Kegan Paul .
Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall .
Gastil, J. (1993) Undemocratic discourse: a review of theory and research on political discourse . Discourse and Society (3) (4), 469 500.
Geis, M. (1987) The Language of Politics New York: Springer Verlag .
Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self Identity Cambridge: Polity .
Gill, A. M. and Whedbee, K. (1997) Rhetoric . In T. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as Structure and Social Process . London: Sage , 157 85.
Goodman, S. (1996) Visual English . In S. Goodman and D. Graddol (eds), Redesigning English: New Texts, New Identities . London: Routledge , 38 72.
Graber, D. A. (1981) Political languages . In D. Nimmo and K. Sanders (eds), Handbook of Political Communication . Beverly Hills: Sage , 195 224.
Gunn, B. (1989) The Politic Word. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Ulster at Jordanstown .
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985) An Introduction to Functional Grammar London: Arnold .
Hansard Offical Report, November 1st, 1993.
Hansard Official Report, November 29th, 1993.
Hart, R. P. (1985) Systematic analysis of political discourse: the development of DICTION . In K. R. Sanders, L. L. Kaid, and D. Nimmo (eds), Political Communication Yearbook 1984 . Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press , 92 137.
Hodge, B. and Fowler, R. (1979) Orwellian linguistics. In Fowler et al. (1979) .
Holly, W. (1989) Credibility and Political Language . In R. Wodak (ed.), Language Power and Ideology . Amsterdam: John Benjamins , 115 35.
Horkheimer, M. and Adorno, T. W. (1972) The Dialectic of Enlightenment New York: Herder and Herder .
Kress, G. (1988) Linguistic Processes in Sociocultural Practice Oxford: Oxford University Press .
Kress, G. and Hodge, G. (1979) Language as Ideology London: Routledge .
Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (1990) Reading Images . Deakin, Vic.: Deakin University .
Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (1996) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design London: Routledge and Kegan Paul .
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980) Metaphors We Live By Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
Lambert, W., Hodgson, R. Gardner, and Fillenbaum, S. (1960) Evaluative reactions to spoken language . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology (60) , 44 51.
Leech, G. (1995) Semantics Harmondsworth: Penguin .
Liebes, T. and Ribak, R. (1991) A mother 's battle against TV news: a case study of political socialisation . Discourse and Society (2) (2), 202 22.
Lippi-Green, R. (1997) English With An Accent London: Routledge and Kegan Paul .
Lwaitama, A. F. (1988) Variations in the use of personal pronouns in the political oratory of J. K. Nyerere and A. H. Mwinyi . Belfast Working Papers in Language and Linguistics (1) , 1 23.
Maitland, K. and Wilson, J. (1987) Ideological conflict and pronominal resolution . Journal of Pragmatics (11) , 495 512.
Montgomery, M. (1992) An Introduction to Language and Society London: Routledge .
Moss, P. (1985) The rhetoric of defence in the United States: language myth and ideology . In P. Chilton (ed.), Language and the Nuclear Arms Debate . London: Pinter , 45 62.
Navasky, V. (1982) Naming Names Boston: John Calder .
Neaman, J. S. and Sliver, C. G. (1990) Kind Words New York: Facts on File .
Ochs, E. and Taylor, C. (1992) Family narratives as political activity . Discourse and Society (3) (3), 301 40.
Orwell, G. (1969) Politics and the English language . In W. F. Bolton and D. Crystal (eds), The English Language Vol. 2: Essays by Linguists and Men of Letters, 1858–1964 . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 217 19.
Pateman, T. (1981) Linguistics as a branch of critical theory . UEA Papers in Linguistics (14–15) , 1 29.
Pěcheux, M. (1982) Language Semantics and Ideology London: Macmillan .
Pěcheux, M. (1978) Discourse-structure or event . In C. Nelson and L. Grossberg (eds), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture . London: Macmillan , 251 66.
Richardson, K. (1985) Pragmatics of speeches against the peace movement in Britain: a case study . In P. Chilton (ed.), Language and the Nuclear Arms Debate . London: Pinter , 23 40.
Richardson, K. (1991) The debate about nukespeak . Belfast Working Papers in Language and Linguistics (11) , 15 48.
Rose, J. (1989) The Relevance of Ulster Politics . Unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Communication, University of Ulster at Jordanstown .
Schank, R. and Ableson, R. P. (1977) Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
Schiffrin, D. (1987) Discourse Markers Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
Shapiro, M. J. (1981) Language and Political Understanding New Haven, CT: Yale University Press .
Simpson, P. (1988) Language and ideology . Critical Studies in Mass Communication (7) , 166 88.
Simpson, P. (1993) Language Ideology and Point of View London: Routledge and Kegan Paul .
Sperber, B. and Wilson, D. (1996) Relevance . Oxford: Blackwell .
St Evans, J. B. (1989) Bias in Human Reasoning Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum .
Steiner, E. (1985) The concept of context and the theory of action . In P. Chilton (ed.), Language and the Nuclear Arms Debate . London: Pinter , 213 27.
Stubbs, M. (1990) Knowledge about language: grammar, ignorance and society . Special professorial lecture . Institute of Education, University of London .
Stubbs, M. (1996) Text and Corpus Analysis Oxford: Blackwell .
Torode, B. (1991) Review of Fairclough, N., Language and Power (1989) . Discourse and Society (2) (1), 121 2.
van Dijk, T. (1989) Structures of discourse and structures of power . In J. A. Anderson (ed.), Communication Yearbook 12 . Newbury Park, CA: Sage , 163 83.
van Dijk, T. (1991) Racism and the Press . London: Routledge and Kegan Paul ,
van Dijk, T
Wiesner, M. J. (1991) Mario M. Cuomo decides to run: the construction of the political self . Discourse and Society (2) (1), 85 104.
Wilson, J. (1990) Politically Speaking Oxford: Blackwell .
Wilson, J. (1993) Discourse marking and accounts of violence in Northern Ireland . Text (13) (3), 455 75.
Wilson, J. (1997) Metalinguistic negation and textual aspects of political discourse . In J. Blommaert and C. Bulcaen (eds), Political Linguistics . Amsterdam: John Benjamins , 69 89.
Wilson, J. and Gunn, B. (1983) Political affiliation. Paper presented to Sociolinguistics Symposium, University of Liverpool .
Wilson, J. and O Brian, K. (1998) Language gender and employability . Mimeo, School of Behavioural and Communication Sciences, University of Ulster .
Wilson, J. and Rose, J. (1997) The language of peace and conflict: Relevance Theory and the Anglo-Irish agreement . Journal of Conflict Studies (XVII) (2), 51 73.
Wodak, R. (1989) 1968: The power of political jargon – a “Club 2” discussion . In R. Wodak (ed.), Language Power and Ideology . Amsterdam: John Benjamins , 137 63.
Wodak, R. (1995) Disorders of Discourse London: Longman .
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free