Poverty Reduction and Welfare Provision for Single Parents in Aotearoa/ New Zealand and the United States - A Comparative Analysis
In 1999, UNICEF reported that countries which have the most generous welfare provision, have the lowest rates of child poverty and that children who live in sole parent families are more likely to live in poverty (Bradbury & Jantti, 1999). This paper will look at child poverty in New Zealand and the United States and at welfare provision for single parents. It will examine current global discourses around poverty reduction and whether this goal is likely to be achieved under these welfare programmes.
BACKGROUND – The Rise in Single Parents Since the 1960’s
After 1900, liberal economic governance and ‘industrialization’ in both the US and New Zealand eroded the extended family in favour of a male breadwinner, ‘nuclear’ family as a mobile, flexible, cost effective work unit (Hale, 1990). Following the civil rights movements of the 1960’s it also became increasingly unacceptable for male breadwinners to have sole access to the labour market or to dominate family units and women willingly and unwillingly joined the workforce. To achieve pay equity they needed to be equally mobile and flexible. Nuclear family units have deconstructed in a myriad of ways under increasingly malleable social and labour market conditions. Separation and divorce rates have risen as have out-of-wedlock births (Ellwood & Jencks, 2004). Consequently, increasing numbers of women raise children alone.
In 2004 there were 73 million children (under 18) in the US, a quarter of the total population (US Gov Forum. 2006) and approximately 1 million in New Zealand (Stats NZ. 2006). Single parent families made up 29 % of families with children under 18 in both countries. (Statistics NZ. 2001. Simmons and O‘Neill, 2001. P4)
Current demographic trends suggest that single parent families with children will increase to 36% of all families with children in NZ by 2021 (Statistics NZ, 2004). Between 1990 and 2000, single parent, female headed families increased in the US from 6 to 7.6 million households, an increase of 26%. Some argue that this trend is associated with easy access to welfare but since the 1970’s, (in both countries) cash assistance from welfare benefits has diminished but the number of female headed single families have increased (Fitzgerald & Ribar, 2004). It is likely that increasing single parenthood occurs as a result of a myriad of social complexities including greater choice and freedom for women and their participation in the labour market.
No. of Households with children under 18
Percentage of these Households headed by single parent families
24% Percentage of Households headed by single parent males with children under 18
(Statistics NZ. 2001. Simmons and O‘Neill, 2001. P4)
Global Discourse on Child Poverty
The wellbeing of children is a key yardstick for measuring national development. Indeed, the ultimate criterion for gauging the integrity of society…is the way it treats children, particularly the poorest and most vulnerable ones.
(UNICEF, 2000. p7)
UNICEF’s International Child Development Centre (Innocenti Research Centre) has commissioned a number of reports on child poverty in developed countries. It aims to develop a new global ethic for children and promotes the effective implementation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, in both developing and industrialized countries (Innocenti Website, 2007). In order to do cross national comparisons, UNICEF uses a poverty threshold of 50% of the national median income.
Child Poverty Across Industrialised Nations (Bradbury & Jantti, 1999), finds that:
across the industrial world, that English speaking countries have higher rates of child poverty •
countries with high national income tend to have...
References: Baker, Maureen and Tippin, David. 1999. Poverty, Social Assistance, and the
Employability of Mothers: Restructuring Welfare States
Beaujot, Roderick and Liu, Jiayne. 2003. Social Assistance, Custody and Child
Poverty: Cross National Comparisons
Bradbury, Bruce and Jantti, Markus. 1999. Child Poverty Across
Coutts, Justin. 2004. ‘New Zealand Lessons from United States Welfare Reforms’.
Edin, Kathryn and Lein, Laura. 1997. Work, Welfare and Single Mothers’ Economic
Ellwood, David T. and Jencks, Christopher. 2004. The Spread of Single-Parent
Families in the United States since 1960
Fitzgerald, John M. and Ribar, David C. 2004. Transitions in Welfare Participation
and Female Headship
Hale, Sylvia M. 1990. Controversies in Sociology. Toronto: Copp Clark Pitman Ltd.
Inland Revenue Department (IRD) NZ. 2007. ‘Family Assistance’. Available at:
http://www.ird.govt.nz/familyassistance/intro/familysupport/ [Accessed 2.2.07]
Innocenti Research Centre Website, 2007. ‘Overview.’ Available at:
http://www.unicef-icdc.org/aboutIRC/ [Accessed 1.2.07]
Kelsey, Jane. 2002. At the Crossroads. Three Essays. Wellington: Bridget
Williams Books Limited.
McLintock, A.H. 1966. An Encyclopaedia of New Zealand. Available at:
http://www.teara.govt.nz/1966/W/WelfareServices/HistoryOfMonetaryBenefits/en [Accessed 21.1,07]
Monumental Stories Website. 2007. Available at:
http://www.monumentalstories.gen.nz/bio_113.html [Accessed 22.1.07]
NZ Government Website. 2006. Further Fall in Benefit Numbers. Available at:
http://www.beehive.govt.nz/ViewDocument.aspx?DocumentID=28113 [Accessed 1.2.07]
NZ Govt Dept of Labour. 2004. Income Survey. Available at:
http://www.dol.govt.nz/pdfs/Income%20Survey.pdf [Accessed 2.2.07]
NZ Labour Party. 2005. Social Development Policy. Available at:
http://www.labour.org.nz/policy/families/2005policy/pol05-SocDel/index.html [Accessed 1.2.07]
OECD. 2005. Society at a Glance. Available at:
http://www.oecd.org/document/24/0,2340,en_2825_497118_2671576_1_1_1_1,00.html#selection [Accessed 26.1.07]
OECD. 2004. Benefits and Wages. OECD Indicators. Available at:
http://www1.oecd.org/publications/e-book/8104071E.PDF [Accessed 30.1.07]
Rainwater, Lee and Smeeding, Timothy. 1995. 'Doing Poorly: The Real Income of
American Children in a Comparative Perspective ', Luxembourg Income Study, Working Paper No
Sigle-Rushton, Wendy and Waldfogel, Jane. 2006. Motherhood and Women’s
Earnings in Anglo-American , Continental European and Nordic Countries
Simmons, Tavia and O’Neill, Grace. 2001. Households and Families. Census 2000
Smeeding, Timothy. 2005. Government Programs and Social Outcomes: The United
States in Comparative Perspective
Statistics NZ. 2001. Census 2001 Information. Available at:
http://www.stats.govt.nz/census/2001-census-data/2001-families-households/highlights.htm [Accessed 25.1.07]
Statistics NZ. 2004. NZ Family and Household Projections. Available at:
Statistics NZ. 2006. Census 2006 Information. Available at:
Statistics NZ. 2006. NZ Income Survey 2006
Statistics NZ. 2005. Focusing on Women. Available at:
http://statsnz.resultspage.com/search?p=Q&ts=custom&w=median+income+men [Accessed 3.2.07}
Stevens, Jillynn. 2005. Social Welfare Policy: Controlling Gender, Race and Class.
UNICEF. 2000. Poverty Reduction Begins with Children. New York: UNICEF
US Dept of Health and Human Services. 2007. A Brief History of the AFDC Program
Available at: http://www.aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/AFDC/baseline/1history.pdf [Accessed 20.1.07]
US Dept of Health and Human Sciences. 2006. Indicators of Welfare Dependence:
Annual Report to Congress, 2006
US Government Forum on Child and Family Statistics. 2006. Americas Children in
Brief: Key National Indicators of Wellbeing
Weinshenker, Matthew and Heuveline, Patrick. 2006. The International Poverty Gap:
Does Demography Matter? Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper Series
Wiseman, Michael. 1996. Welfare Reform in the United States: A Background Paper.
Housing Policy Debate
Work and Income NZ Website. 2007. Domestic Purposes and Widows Benefit.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document