Macroeconomic Theory & Practice
Extra Credit Research Paper
The Indian Development Planning Era:
An Analysis of the First & Second Five-Year Plans
SUBMITTED UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF
PROF PRABAL K. SEN
D. Krishna Bhaskar (B07080)
Vamsi K. Valluri (B07118)
A planned economy is an economic system with a central or overarching body that exercises control over the economy. The concept was a common feature of many Socialism-inspired economies including India and its most extensive form is referred to as a command or centrally planned economy. The model gained prominence mainly because of its adoption by the erstwhile Soviet Union and later on during the ‘Great Leap Forward’ by China. The anti-thesis of the capitalist-backed ‘laissez-faire’ model, it is currently practiced actively by very few nations, including Cuba, Myanmar & North Korea.
Ironically, though, as many economists point out, it’s very much alive in the corporate world – the heart of the capitalist system, as most global corporations are essentially miniature centrally planned economies. Some of the advantages of planned economic development are: i)
Collective objectives can be met at the cost of smaller individual gains iii)
Adherence to a vision/design
The second and third points mentioned above were a major draw for the newly-independent and emerging nations to opt for this approach.
The following are some of the disadvantages associated with the model: i)
Inefficient resource distribution
Lack of incentive for innovation, hard work, etc
Infringes on individualism
The period beginning late 80s saw India, People’s Republic of China & Soviet Union – three of the biggest planned economies – transition to a market economy model owing to several constraints and, in the case of the Soviet Union, political restructuring. After initial transitional hiccups, all three are now counted among the fastest growing economies, globally.
In the Indian context, it is widely held that the planned economic development model was instrumental in laying a firm foundation for industrialization and self-sustenance that has led India to its current global status of an economic powerhouse.
2. Historical Perspective
India’s initial industrialization under the British rule, had fetched largely mixed results for the nation – on the one hand, India’s production index at 239.7 (in 1938 with 1913 as base) was the second highest in the world (exceeded only by Japan’s 552.0) while on the other, it remained largely non-industrialized and one of the poorest, globally. The British never actively encouraged the extension of the ‘laissez-faire’ model across sectors and all that the indigenous entrepreneurs had managed was to establish a modern textile industry. Consequently, different stakeholders – nationalists, intellectuals, businessmen – agreed “that laissez-faire was the root of all evil and central planning the new panacea”. (Bhagwati & Desai)
The foundations of India’s development strategy were laid in the pre-Independence era itself, when several entities proposed their vision for India’s future development. Some of the plans included the Sir M. Visveswaraya Plan – proposed by the master Engineer himself; the Indian National Congress’ National Planning Committee Plan with the blessings of Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru); the ‘Bombay Plan’ formulated by a group of prominent businessmen that included Mr. J.N. Tata, Mr. G.D. Birla and Mr. Purushottam Thakurdas among others; The Indian Federation of Labor’s ‘The People’s Plan’; and finally, the non-industrialization oriented plan proposed by Mahatma Gandhi’s followers.
Most of the planners were driven by the overarching desire to achieve self-reliance, particularly in the manufacturing goods sector. According to Mr. Nehru, “the three fundamental requirements of India,...
References: • “Textbook of Economic Development” by Suman K. Mukerjee
• “The Ghost of Financing Gap” by William Easterly (July 1997)
The Mahalanobis Model is a brainchild of the Indian statistician, Prasanta Chandra Mahalanobis (1893 – 1972)
Please join StudyMode to read the full document