Module Code: PM504 2T (SS1)
Class/Group: Group A, Class F
Module Title: Skills for Study 1
Assignment Title: To what extent does globalisation economically benefit developing countries? Tutor Name: Graham Henderson
Student ID Number: 2059661
Date of Submission: October 25, 2012
Globalization is a source of both hope and apprehension, especially for developing countries. During the past several decades the greater accesses to developing country markets have improved the productivity and living standard and brought significant benefits to economic growth of the world. On the other hand, these positive influences coincide with shaper polarization, heighted the level of inequality within developed and developing countries (Stallings, 2007). Therefore, this essay will contend that the growth provided by globalization in developing countries is short-term; in the long-term, the huge capital flows, the exploitation of labor and the depletion of resources will create an imbalance in global order which will benefit neither developing, nor developed countries. Therefore, the aspects of foreign investment liberalization will be introduced firstly, and then will be international division of labor and management of natural resources will be analyzed thirdly. At last, the conclusion of this essay will be drawn.
Recently, the majority of developing countries trend to rely on private capital as a source of funding. Since the early 1990s, the external capital flows have made a great contribution to the funding that has made up over 75% (Tanzi, 2004:532). The major reason to this capital flow, from less than 30% in the early 1990s to nearly 70% in total by 1998 of sharing on funding, is foreign direct investment (FDI) consistently (UNCTAD, 2003). Since the late of 20th century, due to the great benefits from foreign investment, many countries, developing countries in particular, have changed or created the policies and environment to be more amenable to FDI (Abeles, 2001:12).
FDI is an essential element to the economic growth of developing countries, according to a neo-classical economic perspective (Craves, 1996). It means that developing countries obtain the benefits directly from FDI through an inflow of capital, tax revenues, and employment, and indirectly through the technology and knowledge from the foreign investor’s to local enterprises and workers (Svenssion, 2002:576). In addition, the structure of the industry is running to a new level though the entry of competitive foreign enterprises. As a result, to survive in this increasingly competitive environment, local firms are becoming more efficient to raise the productivity to be more competitive; hence, the economic growth rate of developing countries is improved directly. In contrast, FDI may be detrimental to economic development of developing countries since large amount of foreign investment is negative for local enterprises in long-term. Domestic enterprises are crowded by foreign companies such as some leading multinational corporation (e.g. Apple, Mobil, etc) from developed countries, since they are often significantly superior to local firms. This effect reduces the competition in market and then the industry is dominated by foreign entities. The panel study of Agosin and Mayer (2000:150) found that the effect of FDI in Asia, Latin America and Africa, the domestic investment is crowded out. Thus, Agosin and Mayer (2000:164) conclude that the effects of FDI are not always positive and that FDI policy plays a role in determining the outcome.
With the process of globalization, production becomes more globalized, labor market comes to play a greater role in determining the efficiency and productivity of industry. Theoretically, to achieve optimal flexibility of labour market, international division of labour becomes more and more significant (Benner, 2009:69). It is the spatial division of labour which occurs when the process...
References: Abeles, T.P. (2001). The Impact of Globalization. On the Horizon, 9(2), pp 12 – 14.
Afonso, A. and Schuknecht, L. (2011). Income distribution determinants and public spending efficiency. Journal of Economic Inequality, 8(3), pp 367-389.
Agosin, M.R. and Mayer, R. (2005). Foreign investment in developing countries: Does it crowd in domestic investment? Oxford Development Studies, 33(2), pp 149-162.
Bee, A. (2012, March 8th). Household Income Inequality Within U.S. Counties: 2006–2010. U.S. Census Bureau News.
Benner, C. (2009). Labor Flexibility. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, 63(4), pp 66-71.
Craves, R.E. (1996). Multinational enterprise and economic analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Curtis, F. (2009). Peak globalization: Climate change, oil depletion and global trade. Ecological Economics, 69(2), pp 427-434.
Eckel, C. (2003). Labor market adjustments to globalization: unemployment versus relative wages. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 14(2), pp 173-188.
Geyer, F. (2003). Globalization and sustainability: the cynics, the romantics and the realists. Kybernetes, 32(9), pp 1235-1252.
Liang, Q. and Teng, J. (2012). Financial development and economic growth: Evidence from China. China Economic Review, 17(4), pp 395-411.
Stallings, B. (2007). The Globalization of Capital Flows: Who Benefits? New York: Sage Publications, Inc.
Svensson, G. (2002). Beyond global marketing and the globalization of marketing activities. Management Decision, 40(6), pp 574 – 583.
Risso, W.A. and Carrera, E.S. (2012). Inequality and economic growth in China. Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, 5(2), pp 80-90.
Tanzi, V. (2004). Globalization and the need for fiscal reform in developing countries. Journal of Policy Modeling, 26(4), pp525-542.
UNCTAD. (2003). World investment report: FDI policies for development and international perspectives. Geneva: UNU Press.
Yu, W. (2010). China Rules: Globalization and Political Transformation. Chinese Management Studies, 4(2), pp 184-185.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document